Configure lower reasoning effort for narrow early investigation reviews

This commit is contained in:
Nico committed 2026-10-17 23:17:32 +02:00
1 parent d44563650d
commit 0307ebfac0
7 files changed
+188 -3

No files matched your search

+2
View File
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ max_output_tokens = 4096
# reasoning_effort = "medium"
# Optional override for entity resolution planning and assessment only:
# entity_resolution_reasoning_effort = "low"
# Optional override only for settling pending work before early diagnosis:
# investigation_review_reasoning_effort = "low"
[[llm.providers]]
id = "own-server"
+2
View File
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ response_format = "json_object"
max_output_tokens = 16384
reasoning_effort = "medium"
entity_resolution_reasoning_effort = "low"
# Only the narrow early-review assessment, not regular investigation or diagnosis:
investigation_review_reasoning_effort = "low"
# Enabled by default on this adapter. Stable case context plus instructions/schema;
# live evidence is always complete. Explicit false is an operational override.
+15
View File
@@ -27,3 +27,18 @@ Cache-Anfragen berücksichtigen v16. Der engere Review-Systemprompt und sein Aus
Offline-Projektion derselben gespeicherten Bug20-Kontexte, ohne API: die beiden Review-Anfragen sinken von 24547 auf 16220 Zeichen (-33,92 %) und von 24182 auf 16725 (-30,84 %). Reguläre Anfragen verändern sich zwischen +2,50 % (zusätzliche klare Referenzregeln) und -0,92 % (mehr konsolidierbare Herkunftsobjekte). Diese Maßnahme ist dort primär Fehlervermeidung, keine große neue Inputreduktion.
Einzelwerte: [investigation-v16-offline-20261017.json](measurements/investigation-v16-offline-20261017.json). Die Messung beweist weder weniger Denktokens noch tatsächliche Kostenersparnis. Denkintensität und Ausgabelimit wurden bewusst nicht pauschal abgesenkt. Der weiche Zeichenrichtwert bleibt bestehen; frische Gegenbelege werden dafür nicht abgeschnitten. Ein späterer Live-Regressionstest muss Aufrufzahl, Fehler, Denken, Cache und Ergebnisqualität gemeinsam vergleichen.
## Separate Denkintensität für die Frühabschluss-Bewertung
Pro Provider kann `investigation_review_reasoning_effort` gesetzt werden:
```toml
reasoning_effort = "medium"
investigation_review_reasoning_effort = "low"
```
Nur der enge v16-Aufruf mit Aufgabe `assess_pending_result_for_early_review`, Status `preparing` und dem auf defer/reject begrenzten Antwortvertrag verwendet diesen Override. Normale Untersuchungsturns, Interpretation, Hypothesengenerierung und finale Diagnose behalten ihre Einstellungen. Für jeden Failover-Provider gilt dessen eigener Wert. Omission übernimmt die bisherige allgemeine Denkintensität; ohne Override bleibt auch der Konfigurationssnapshot mit früheren Operationen kompatibel.
Gemini erhält den angeforderten Wert als thinkingLevel, der kompatible Adapter als reasoning_effort. Die tatsächlich unterstützten Werte hängen weiterhin vom Modell ab. Keine automatische Abschaltung des Denkens, kein kleineres Ausgabelimit und kein verändertes Hypothesenbudget. Die Call-Metadaten speichern bei Anwendung reasoning_profile=investigation_review und den angeforderten reasoning_effort, auch bei kontrolliert fehlgeschlagenen Antworten. Das beweist die übermittelte Einstellung, nicht deren interne Umsetzung durch den Anbieter; dafür sind gemessene Denktokens maßgeblich.
Für den nächsten frischen lokalen Vergleich ist `config/llm.early-review.local.toml` vorbereitet: Kopie des bisherigen kompakten Profils, ergänzt um den Override low. Das vorige Profil wurde nicht geändert. Ein Konfigurationswechsel mitten in einer bereits gespeicherten LLM-Operation kann kontrolliert als LLM_OPERATION_CONFLICT abgelehnt werden; neue Vergleiche deshalb mit frischem Testworkspace starten. Es wurden keine kostenpflichtigen Aufrufe zur Einrichtung ausgeführt.
+7 -3
View File
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ class ProviderConfig:
cost_currency: str = "USD"
reasoning_effort: str | None = None
entity_resolution_reasoning_effort: str | None = None
investigation_review_reasoning_effort: str | None = None
cached_input_cost_per_million: float | None = None
cache_storage_cost_per_million_hour: float | None = None
context_cache: bool | None = None
@@ -76,7 +77,8 @@ class ProviderConfig:
raise LLMError("LLM_CONFIG")
if self.context_cache is not None and type(self.context_cache) is not bool:
raise LLMError('LLM_CONFIG')
for effort in (self.reasoning_effort, self.entity_resolution_reasoning_effort):
for effort in (self.reasoning_effort, self.entity_resolution_reasoning_effort,
self.investigation_review_reasoning_effort):
if effort is not None and (not isinstance(effort, str) or effort not in {"none", "minimal", "low", "medium", "high"}):
raise LLMError("LLM_CONFIG")
positive(self.timeout_seconds)
@@ -94,7 +96,8 @@ class ProviderConfig:
or not re.fullmatch(r'[A-Za-z0-9_-]{1,128}', self.cache_required_prompt_prefix)):
raise LLMError('LLM_CONFIG')
if self.adapter == 'gemini' and (not re.fullmatch(r'[A-Za-z0-9._-]+', self.model)
or self.reasoning_effort == 'none' or self.entity_resolution_reasoning_effort == 'none'):
or self.reasoning_effort == 'none' or self.entity_resolution_reasoning_effort == 'none'
or self.investigation_review_reasoning_effort == 'none'):
raise LLMError('LLM_CONFIG')
if not isinstance(self.cost_currency, str) or not re.fullmatch(r"[A-Z]{3}", self.cost_currency):
raise LLMError("LLM_CONFIG")
@@ -164,7 +167,8 @@ class GatewayConfig:
'cache_min_prefix_chars': 16000}.items():
if provider[name] == default:
del provider[name]
for name in ("reasoning_effort", "entity_resolution_reasoning_effort"):
for name in ("reasoning_effort", "entity_resolution_reasoning_effort",
"investigation_review_reasoning_effort"):
if provider[name] is None:
del provider[name]
return result
+25
View File
@@ -34,6 +34,27 @@ def _schema_check(schema):
_schema_check(value)
def is_investigation_review(request):
"""Route the controller's narrow v16 review, never arbitrary research text."""
if request['prompt_version'] != 'investigation_project_v16':
return False
try:
message = next(m for m in reversed(request['messages']) if m['role'] == 'user')
document = parse_manifest(message['content'].encode('utf-8'))
return (document.get('task') == 'assess_pending_result_for_early_review'
and document['input']['early_review']['request']['status'] == 'preparing'
and set(request['output_schema']['properties']['next']['properties']['kind']['enum'])
== {'defer','reject'})
except (ValueError, TypeError, KeyError, AttributeError, StopIteration, RecursionError):
return False
def review_metadata(provider, request):
if provider.investigation_review_reasoning_effort is not None and is_investigation_review(request):
return {'reasoning_profile':'investigation_review', 'reasoning_effort':provider.reasoning_effort}
return {}
class LLMGateway:
def __init__(self, config, adapters=None):
self.config = config
@@ -79,6 +100,8 @@ class LLMGateway:
if (provider.entity_resolution_reasoning_effort is not None
and re.fullmatch(r"entity_resolution_(plan|assessment)_v[1-9][0-9]*", request["prompt_version"])):
provider = replace(provider, reasoning_effort=provider.entity_resolution_reasoning_effort)
if provider.investigation_review_reasoning_effort is not None and is_investigation_review(request):
provider = replace(provider, reasoning_effort=provider.investigation_review_reasoning_effort)
started = time.monotonic()
response = None
try:
@@ -106,6 +129,7 @@ class LLMGateway:
"estimated_cost": cost, "elapsed_seconds": round(time.monotonic() - started, 6), "attempts": attempts}
metadata["cost_currency"] = provider.cost_currency if cost is not None else None
metadata.update(usage)
metadata.update(review_metadata(provider, request))
if any(usage[k] is not None for k in ('estimated_input_cost', 'estimated_cached_input_cost',
'estimated_output_cost', 'estimated_cache_storage_cost')):
metadata['cost_currency'] = provider.cost_currency
@@ -159,6 +183,7 @@ class LLMGateway:
'input_tokens':input_tokens,'output_tokens':output_tokens,'cost_currency':None,
'elapsed_seconds':round(time.monotonic()-started,6),'attempts':copy.deepcopy(attempts)}
error.metadata.update(usage_metadata(provider, response, details))
error.metadata.update(review_metadata(provider, request))
if any(error.metadata[k] is not None for k in ('estimated_cost','estimated_input_cost',
'estimated_cached_input_cost','estimated_output_cost','estimated_cache_storage_cost')):
error.metadata['cost_currency'] = provider.cost_currency
@@ -104,6 +104,18 @@
"items": {
"$ref": "#/$defs/http_attempt"
}
},
"reasoning_profile": {
"const": "investigation_review"
},
"reasoning_effort": {
"enum": [
"none",
"minimal",
"low",
"medium",
"high"
]
}
}
},
+125
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
import asyncio
import json
from dataclasses import replace
import pytest
from test_investigation_review import review_context
from test_lean_investigation_decision import reply
from test_llm_gateway import provider, http_endpoint, active_case
from viano_bug_analysis.analysis.investigation_prompt import build_prompt
from viano_bug_analysis.llm import (GatewayConfig, ProviderConfig, ProviderResponse,
ProviderUnavailable, LLMGateway, LLMError, CaseLLMRunner)
from viano_bug_analysis.package import PackageReader, PackageValidator
def review_request():
return build_prompt(review_context())
def review_reply():
result=reply();result['next']={'kind':'defer','reason':'Pending evidence assessed'}
return result
class RecordingAdapter:
def __init__(self, fail_first=False, error=False):
self.calls=[];self.fail_first=fail_first;self.error=error
async def generate(self, config, request, *, max_response_bytes):
self.calls.append((config.id,config.reasoning_effort))
if self.error:raise LLMError('LLM_RESPONSE')
if self.fail_first and len(self.calls)==1:raise ProviderUnavailable('LLM_CONNECTION')
return ProviderResponse(review_reply(),'fixture-model',100,20)
@pytest.mark.parametrize('mode',['review','normal','diagnosis','old_version','wrong_task','wrong_actions'])
def test_effort_override_applies_only_to_narrow_controller_review(mode):
req=review_request();c=review_context()
if mode=='normal':c['early_review']['request']=None;req=build_prompt(c)
elif mode=='old_version':c['prompt_version']='investigation_project_v15';req=build_prompt(c)
elif mode=='diagnosis':req['prompt_version']='diagnosis_early_v6'
elif mode=='wrong_task':
doc=json.loads(req['messages'][1]['content']);doc['task']='investigate_hypothesis'
req['messages'][1]['content']=json.dumps(doc)
elif mode=='wrong_actions':req['output_schema']['properties']['next']['properties']['kind']['enum'].append('tool')
cfg=GatewayConfig((provider(reasoning_effort='medium',investigation_review_reasoning_effort='low'),))
adapter=RecordingAdapter();out=asyncio.run(LLMGateway(cfg,{'fixture':adapter}).complete_round(req))
assert adapter.calls==[('first','low' if mode=='review' else 'medium')]
assert cfg.providers[0].reasoning_effort=='medium'
assert out['metadata'].get('reasoning_profile')==('investigation_review' if mode=='review' else None)
def test_provider_failover_uses_each_providers_review_setting():
cfg=GatewayConfig((provider(reasoning_effort='high',investigation_review_reasoning_effort='low'),
provider('second',reasoning_effort='medium',investigation_review_reasoning_effort='minimal')))
adapter=RecordingAdapter(fail_first=True)
out=asyncio.run(LLMGateway(cfg,{'fixture':adapter}).complete_round(review_request()))
assert adapter.calls==[('first','low'),('second','minimal')]
assert out['metadata']['reasoning_effort']=='minimal'
@pytest.mark.parametrize('bad',[True,0,'unknown',[],{}])
def test_invalid_override_is_rejected(bad):
with pytest.raises(LLMError,match='LLM_CONFIG'):
provider(investigation_review_reasoning_effort=bad)
def test_omitted_override_preserves_snapshot_and_inherits_general_effort():
cfg=GatewayConfig((provider(reasoning_effort='medium'),))
assert 'investigation_review_reasoning_effort' not in cfg.snapshot()['providers'][0]
adapter=RecordingAdapter();asyncio.run(LLMGateway(cfg,{'fixture':adapter}).complete_round(review_request()))
assert adapter.calls==[('first','medium')]
changed=GatewayConfig((replace(cfg.providers[0],investigation_review_reasoning_effort='low'),))
assert changed.snapshot()['providers'][0]['investigation_review_reasoning_effort']=='low'
def test_toml_loads_override(tmp_path):
p=tmp_path/'llm.toml';p.write_text('''[llm]
[[llm.providers]]
id="fixture"
model="fixture"
base_url="http://localhost/v1"
reasoning_effort="medium"
investigation_review_reasoning_effort="low"
''')
assert GatewayConfig.load(p).providers[0].investigation_review_reasoning_effort=='low'
def test_native_gemini_receives_low_thinking_level(monkeypatch):
from test_llm_caching import config, native, scripted
from viano_bug_analysis.llm.gemini import GeminiProvider
adapter=GeminiProvider();envelope=native()
envelope['candidates'][0]['content']['parts'][0]['text']=json.dumps(review_reply())
seen=scripted(adapter,monkeypatch,[envelope])
cfg=GatewayConfig((replace(config(),context_cache=False,reasoning_effort='medium',
investigation_review_reasoning_effort='low'),))
out=asyncio.run(LLMGateway(cfg,{'gemini':adapter}).complete_round(review_request()))
assert seen[0][1]['generationConfig']['thinkingConfig']=={'thinkingLevel':'low'}
assert out['metadata']['reasoning_effort']=='low'
with pytest.raises(LLMError,match='LLM_CONFIG'):
replace(cfg.providers[0],investigation_review_reasoning_effort='none')
def test_compatible_transport_receives_low_reasoning_effort(http_endpoint):
url,seen,response=http_endpoint
response['body']['choices'][0]['message']['content']=json.dumps(review_reply())
cfg=GatewayConfig((ProviderConfig(id='test',model='configured',base_url=url,
reasoning_effort='medium',investigation_review_reasoning_effort='low'),))
asyncio.run(LLMGateway(cfg).complete_round(review_request()))
assert seen[0]['body']['reasoning_effort']=='low'
@pytest.mark.parametrize('failed',[False,True])
def test_effective_setting_survives_checkpoint_and_replay(active_case,failed):
store,_,_=active_case;adapter=RecordingAdapter(error=failed)
cfg=GatewayConfig((provider(reasoning_effort='medium',investigation_review_reasoning_effort='low'),))
runner=CaseLLMRunner(store,LLMGateway(cfg,{'fixture':adapter}))
req=review_request()
result=asyncio.run(runner.run('case-A','stable-package',operation_id='review-effort',request=req))
assert PackageValidator().validate(result.package).valid
with PackageReader(result.package) as reader:
call=json.loads(reader.read_bytes(result.result_ref))
assert call['outcome']['metadata']['reasoning_effort']=='low'
assert asyncio.run(runner.run('case-A','stable-package',operation_id='review-effort',request=req))==result
assert len(adapter.calls)==1