Configure lower reasoning effort for narrow early investigation reviews
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
d44563650d
commit
0307ebfac0
7 files changed
+188
-3
No files matched your search
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ max_output_tokens = 4096
|
||||
# reasoning_effort = "medium"
|
||||
# Optional override for entity resolution planning and assessment only:
|
||||
# entity_resolution_reasoning_effort = "low"
|
||||
# Optional override only for settling pending work before early diagnosis:
|
||||
# investigation_review_reasoning_effort = "low"
|
||||
|
||||
[[llm.providers]]
|
||||
id = "own-server"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ response_format = "json_object"
|
||||
max_output_tokens = 16384
|
||||
reasoning_effort = "medium"
|
||||
entity_resolution_reasoning_effort = "low"
|
||||
# Only the narrow early-review assessment, not regular investigation or diagnosis:
|
||||
investigation_review_reasoning_effort = "low"
|
||||
|
||||
# Enabled by default on this adapter. Stable case context plus instructions/schema;
|
||||
# live evidence is always complete. Explicit false is an operational override.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -27,3 +27,18 @@ Cache-Anfragen berücksichtigen v16. Der engere Review-Systemprompt und sein Aus
|
||||
Offline-Projektion derselben gespeicherten Bug20-Kontexte, ohne API: die beiden Review-Anfragen sinken von 24547 auf 16220 Zeichen (-33,92 %) und von 24182 auf 16725 (-30,84 %). Reguläre Anfragen verändern sich zwischen +2,50 % (zusätzliche klare Referenzregeln) und -0,92 % (mehr konsolidierbare Herkunftsobjekte). Diese Maßnahme ist dort primär Fehlervermeidung, keine große neue Inputreduktion.
|
||||
|
||||
Einzelwerte: [investigation-v16-offline-20261017.json](measurements/investigation-v16-offline-20261017.json). Die Messung beweist weder weniger Denktokens noch tatsächliche Kostenersparnis. Denkintensität und Ausgabelimit wurden bewusst nicht pauschal abgesenkt. Der weiche Zeichenrichtwert bleibt bestehen; frische Gegenbelege werden dafür nicht abgeschnitten. Ein späterer Live-Regressionstest muss Aufrufzahl, Fehler, Denken, Cache und Ergebnisqualität gemeinsam vergleichen.
|
||||
|
||||
## Separate Denkintensität für die Frühabschluss-Bewertung
|
||||
|
||||
Pro Provider kann `investigation_review_reasoning_effort` gesetzt werden:
|
||||
|
||||
```toml
|
||||
reasoning_effort = "medium"
|
||||
investigation_review_reasoning_effort = "low"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Nur der enge v16-Aufruf mit Aufgabe `assess_pending_result_for_early_review`, Status `preparing` und dem auf defer/reject begrenzten Antwortvertrag verwendet diesen Override. Normale Untersuchungsturns, Interpretation, Hypothesengenerierung und finale Diagnose behalten ihre Einstellungen. Für jeden Failover-Provider gilt dessen eigener Wert. Omission übernimmt die bisherige allgemeine Denkintensität; ohne Override bleibt auch der Konfigurationssnapshot mit früheren Operationen kompatibel.
|
||||
|
||||
Gemini erhält den angeforderten Wert als thinkingLevel, der kompatible Adapter als reasoning_effort. Die tatsächlich unterstützten Werte hängen weiterhin vom Modell ab. Keine automatische Abschaltung des Denkens, kein kleineres Ausgabelimit und kein verändertes Hypothesenbudget. Die Call-Metadaten speichern bei Anwendung reasoning_profile=investigation_review und den angeforderten reasoning_effort, auch bei kontrolliert fehlgeschlagenen Antworten. Das beweist die übermittelte Einstellung, nicht deren interne Umsetzung durch den Anbieter; dafür sind gemessene Denktokens maßgeblich.
|
||||
|
||||
Für den nächsten frischen lokalen Vergleich ist `config/llm.early-review.local.toml` vorbereitet: Kopie des bisherigen kompakten Profils, ergänzt um den Override low. Das vorige Profil wurde nicht geändert. Ein Konfigurationswechsel mitten in einer bereits gespeicherten LLM-Operation kann kontrolliert als LLM_OPERATION_CONFLICT abgelehnt werden; neue Vergleiche deshalb mit frischem Testworkspace starten. Es wurden keine kostenpflichtigen Aufrufe zur Einrichtung ausgeführt.
|
||||
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ class ProviderConfig:
|
||||
cost_currency: str = "USD"
|
||||
reasoning_effort: str | None = None
|
||||
entity_resolution_reasoning_effort: str | None = None
|
||||
investigation_review_reasoning_effort: str | None = None
|
||||
cached_input_cost_per_million: float | None = None
|
||||
cache_storage_cost_per_million_hour: float | None = None
|
||||
context_cache: bool | None = None
|
||||
@@ -76,7 +77,8 @@ class ProviderConfig:
|
||||
raise LLMError("LLM_CONFIG")
|
||||
if self.context_cache is not None and type(self.context_cache) is not bool:
|
||||
raise LLMError('LLM_CONFIG')
|
||||
for effort in (self.reasoning_effort, self.entity_resolution_reasoning_effort):
|
||||
for effort in (self.reasoning_effort, self.entity_resolution_reasoning_effort,
|
||||
self.investigation_review_reasoning_effort):
|
||||
if effort is not None and (not isinstance(effort, str) or effort not in {"none", "minimal", "low", "medium", "high"}):
|
||||
raise LLMError("LLM_CONFIG")
|
||||
positive(self.timeout_seconds)
|
||||
@@ -94,7 +96,8 @@ class ProviderConfig:
|
||||
or not re.fullmatch(r'[A-Za-z0-9_-]{1,128}', self.cache_required_prompt_prefix)):
|
||||
raise LLMError('LLM_CONFIG')
|
||||
if self.adapter == 'gemini' and (not re.fullmatch(r'[A-Za-z0-9._-]+', self.model)
|
||||
or self.reasoning_effort == 'none' or self.entity_resolution_reasoning_effort == 'none'):
|
||||
or self.reasoning_effort == 'none' or self.entity_resolution_reasoning_effort == 'none'
|
||||
or self.investigation_review_reasoning_effort == 'none'):
|
||||
raise LLMError('LLM_CONFIG')
|
||||
if not isinstance(self.cost_currency, str) or not re.fullmatch(r"[A-Z]{3}", self.cost_currency):
|
||||
raise LLMError("LLM_CONFIG")
|
||||
@@ -164,7 +167,8 @@ class GatewayConfig:
|
||||
'cache_min_prefix_chars': 16000}.items():
|
||||
if provider[name] == default:
|
||||
del provider[name]
|
||||
for name in ("reasoning_effort", "entity_resolution_reasoning_effort"):
|
||||
for name in ("reasoning_effort", "entity_resolution_reasoning_effort",
|
||||
"investigation_review_reasoning_effort"):
|
||||
if provider[name] is None:
|
||||
del provider[name]
|
||||
return result
|
||||
@@ -34,6 +34,27 @@ def _schema_check(schema):
|
||||
_schema_check(value)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def is_investigation_review(request):
|
||||
"""Route the controller's narrow v16 review, never arbitrary research text."""
|
||||
if request['prompt_version'] != 'investigation_project_v16':
|
||||
return False
|
||||
try:
|
||||
message = next(m for m in reversed(request['messages']) if m['role'] == 'user')
|
||||
document = parse_manifest(message['content'].encode('utf-8'))
|
||||
return (document.get('task') == 'assess_pending_result_for_early_review'
|
||||
and document['input']['early_review']['request']['status'] == 'preparing'
|
||||
and set(request['output_schema']['properties']['next']['properties']['kind']['enum'])
|
||||
== {'defer','reject'})
|
||||
except (ValueError, TypeError, KeyError, AttributeError, StopIteration, RecursionError):
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def review_metadata(provider, request):
|
||||
if provider.investigation_review_reasoning_effort is not None and is_investigation_review(request):
|
||||
return {'reasoning_profile':'investigation_review', 'reasoning_effort':provider.reasoning_effort}
|
||||
return {}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class LLMGateway:
|
||||
def __init__(self, config, adapters=None):
|
||||
self.config = config
|
||||
@@ -79,6 +100,8 @@ class LLMGateway:
|
||||
if (provider.entity_resolution_reasoning_effort is not None
|
||||
and re.fullmatch(r"entity_resolution_(plan|assessment)_v[1-9][0-9]*", request["prompt_version"])):
|
||||
provider = replace(provider, reasoning_effort=provider.entity_resolution_reasoning_effort)
|
||||
if provider.investigation_review_reasoning_effort is not None and is_investigation_review(request):
|
||||
provider = replace(provider, reasoning_effort=provider.investigation_review_reasoning_effort)
|
||||
started = time.monotonic()
|
||||
response = None
|
||||
try:
|
||||
@@ -106,6 +129,7 @@ class LLMGateway:
|
||||
"estimated_cost": cost, "elapsed_seconds": round(time.monotonic() - started, 6), "attempts": attempts}
|
||||
metadata["cost_currency"] = provider.cost_currency if cost is not None else None
|
||||
metadata.update(usage)
|
||||
metadata.update(review_metadata(provider, request))
|
||||
if any(usage[k] is not None for k in ('estimated_input_cost', 'estimated_cached_input_cost',
|
||||
'estimated_output_cost', 'estimated_cache_storage_cost')):
|
||||
metadata['cost_currency'] = provider.cost_currency
|
||||
@@ -159,6 +183,7 @@ class LLMGateway:
|
||||
'input_tokens':input_tokens,'output_tokens':output_tokens,'cost_currency':None,
|
||||
'elapsed_seconds':round(time.monotonic()-started,6),'attempts':copy.deepcopy(attempts)}
|
||||
error.metadata.update(usage_metadata(provider, response, details))
|
||||
error.metadata.update(review_metadata(provider, request))
|
||||
if any(error.metadata[k] is not None for k in ('estimated_cost','estimated_input_cost',
|
||||
'estimated_cached_input_cost','estimated_output_cost','estimated_cache_storage_cost')):
|
||||
error.metadata['cost_currency'] = provider.cost_currency
|
||||
@@ -104,6 +104,18 @@
|
||||
"items": {
|
||||
"$ref": "#/$defs/http_attempt"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"reasoning_profile": {
|
||||
"const": "investigation_review"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"reasoning_effort": {
|
||||
"enum": [
|
||||
"none",
|
||||
"minimal",
|
||||
"low",
|
||||
"medium",
|
||||
"high"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
|
||||
import asyncio
|
||||
import json
|
||||
from dataclasses import replace
|
||||
|
||||
import pytest
|
||||
|
||||
from test_investigation_review import review_context
|
||||
from test_lean_investigation_decision import reply
|
||||
from test_llm_gateway import provider, http_endpoint, active_case
|
||||
from viano_bug_analysis.analysis.investigation_prompt import build_prompt
|
||||
from viano_bug_analysis.llm import (GatewayConfig, ProviderConfig, ProviderResponse,
|
||||
ProviderUnavailable, LLMGateway, LLMError, CaseLLMRunner)
|
||||
from viano_bug_analysis.package import PackageReader, PackageValidator
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def review_request():
|
||||
return build_prompt(review_context())
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def review_reply():
|
||||
result=reply();result['next']={'kind':'defer','reason':'Pending evidence assessed'}
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class RecordingAdapter:
|
||||
def __init__(self, fail_first=False, error=False):
|
||||
self.calls=[];self.fail_first=fail_first;self.error=error
|
||||
|
||||
async def generate(self, config, request, *, max_response_bytes):
|
||||
self.calls.append((config.id,config.reasoning_effort))
|
||||
if self.error:raise LLMError('LLM_RESPONSE')
|
||||
if self.fail_first and len(self.calls)==1:raise ProviderUnavailable('LLM_CONNECTION')
|
||||
return ProviderResponse(review_reply(),'fixture-model',100,20)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.parametrize('mode',['review','normal','diagnosis','old_version','wrong_task','wrong_actions'])
|
||||
def test_effort_override_applies_only_to_narrow_controller_review(mode):
|
||||
req=review_request();c=review_context()
|
||||
if mode=='normal':c['early_review']['request']=None;req=build_prompt(c)
|
||||
elif mode=='old_version':c['prompt_version']='investigation_project_v15';req=build_prompt(c)
|
||||
elif mode=='diagnosis':req['prompt_version']='diagnosis_early_v6'
|
||||
elif mode=='wrong_task':
|
||||
doc=json.loads(req['messages'][1]['content']);doc['task']='investigate_hypothesis'
|
||||
req['messages'][1]['content']=json.dumps(doc)
|
||||
elif mode=='wrong_actions':req['output_schema']['properties']['next']['properties']['kind']['enum'].append('tool')
|
||||
cfg=GatewayConfig((provider(reasoning_effort='medium',investigation_review_reasoning_effort='low'),))
|
||||
adapter=RecordingAdapter();out=asyncio.run(LLMGateway(cfg,{'fixture':adapter}).complete_round(req))
|
||||
assert adapter.calls==[('first','low' if mode=='review' else 'medium')]
|
||||
assert cfg.providers[0].reasoning_effort=='medium'
|
||||
assert out['metadata'].get('reasoning_profile')==('investigation_review' if mode=='review' else None)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_provider_failover_uses_each_providers_review_setting():
|
||||
cfg=GatewayConfig((provider(reasoning_effort='high',investigation_review_reasoning_effort='low'),
|
||||
provider('second',reasoning_effort='medium',investigation_review_reasoning_effort='minimal')))
|
||||
adapter=RecordingAdapter(fail_first=True)
|
||||
out=asyncio.run(LLMGateway(cfg,{'fixture':adapter}).complete_round(review_request()))
|
||||
assert adapter.calls==[('first','low'),('second','minimal')]
|
||||
assert out['metadata']['reasoning_effort']=='minimal'
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.parametrize('bad',[True,0,'unknown',[],{}])
|
||||
def test_invalid_override_is_rejected(bad):
|
||||
with pytest.raises(LLMError,match='LLM_CONFIG'):
|
||||
provider(investigation_review_reasoning_effort=bad)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_omitted_override_preserves_snapshot_and_inherits_general_effort():
|
||||
cfg=GatewayConfig((provider(reasoning_effort='medium'),))
|
||||
assert 'investigation_review_reasoning_effort' not in cfg.snapshot()['providers'][0]
|
||||
adapter=RecordingAdapter();asyncio.run(LLMGateway(cfg,{'fixture':adapter}).complete_round(review_request()))
|
||||
assert adapter.calls==[('first','medium')]
|
||||
changed=GatewayConfig((replace(cfg.providers[0],investigation_review_reasoning_effort='low'),))
|
||||
assert changed.snapshot()['providers'][0]['investigation_review_reasoning_effort']=='low'
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_toml_loads_override(tmp_path):
|
||||
p=tmp_path/'llm.toml';p.write_text('''[llm]
|
||||
[[llm.providers]]
|
||||
id="fixture"
|
||||
model="fixture"
|
||||
base_url="http://localhost/v1"
|
||||
reasoning_effort="medium"
|
||||
investigation_review_reasoning_effort="low"
|
||||
''')
|
||||
assert GatewayConfig.load(p).providers[0].investigation_review_reasoning_effort=='low'
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_native_gemini_receives_low_thinking_level(monkeypatch):
|
||||
from test_llm_caching import config, native, scripted
|
||||
from viano_bug_analysis.llm.gemini import GeminiProvider
|
||||
adapter=GeminiProvider();envelope=native()
|
||||
envelope['candidates'][0]['content']['parts'][0]['text']=json.dumps(review_reply())
|
||||
seen=scripted(adapter,monkeypatch,[envelope])
|
||||
cfg=GatewayConfig((replace(config(),context_cache=False,reasoning_effort='medium',
|
||||
investigation_review_reasoning_effort='low'),))
|
||||
out=asyncio.run(LLMGateway(cfg,{'gemini':adapter}).complete_round(review_request()))
|
||||
assert seen[0][1]['generationConfig']['thinkingConfig']=={'thinkingLevel':'low'}
|
||||
assert out['metadata']['reasoning_effort']=='low'
|
||||
with pytest.raises(LLMError,match='LLM_CONFIG'):
|
||||
replace(cfg.providers[0],investigation_review_reasoning_effort='none')
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_compatible_transport_receives_low_reasoning_effort(http_endpoint):
|
||||
url,seen,response=http_endpoint
|
||||
response['body']['choices'][0]['message']['content']=json.dumps(review_reply())
|
||||
cfg=GatewayConfig((ProviderConfig(id='test',model='configured',base_url=url,
|
||||
reasoning_effort='medium',investigation_review_reasoning_effort='low'),))
|
||||
asyncio.run(LLMGateway(cfg).complete_round(review_request()))
|
||||
assert seen[0]['body']['reasoning_effort']=='low'
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.parametrize('failed',[False,True])
|
||||
def test_effective_setting_survives_checkpoint_and_replay(active_case,failed):
|
||||
store,_,_=active_case;adapter=RecordingAdapter(error=failed)
|
||||
cfg=GatewayConfig((provider(reasoning_effort='medium',investigation_review_reasoning_effort='low'),))
|
||||
runner=CaseLLMRunner(store,LLMGateway(cfg,{'fixture':adapter}))
|
||||
req=review_request()
|
||||
result=asyncio.run(runner.run('case-A','stable-package',operation_id='review-effort',request=req))
|
||||
assert PackageValidator().validate(result.package).valid
|
||||
with PackageReader(result.package) as reader:
|
||||
call=json.loads(reader.read_bytes(result.result_ref))
|
||||
assert call['outcome']['metadata']['reasoning_effort']=='low'
|
||||
assert asyncio.run(runner.run('case-A','stable-package',operation_id='review-effort',request=req))==result
|
||||
assert len(adapter.calls)==1
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user